Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pros and cons of 1.4x and 2x extender.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Pros and cons of 1.4x and 2x extender.

    I am considering an extender, and I wanted to know the pros and cons of a 1.4x versus the 2.0. Any and all comments are welcomed and encouraged. Right now I have a 70mm-200mm 4.5 L glass and am anticipating getting a 200mm-400mm L glass lense in the next couple of weeks. Which one would be the best extender to use on both lenses?

    #2
    Don't monkey with the 2.0. It requires too much light and your images will suffer. The 1.4 is nice to have but it will rob you of some light. I have a Kenko 1.4. I understand the Kenko to be as good as the Canon at a significantly lower price. I took this shot with the 1.4 on a 400mm f5.6 lens. It did a fine job.



    This is the Kenko I use:

    Comment


      #3
      Kenko at 1.5 works well for canon. Seriously cuts down on light and focusing speed and accuracy. But! It takes a learning curve to know when the conditions are right. Good results are to be had.
      I wouldn't want a 2x.

      Comment


        #4
        Thanks guys, I was thinking along those lines. I know the extender is a light robber, and Iwas wanting some opinions from the brain trust. Ya'lls info confirmed what I was thinking. Thanks again.

        Comment


          #5
          I'm going to go against the tide on this one and say that a 2X converter produces sharp images. I have a both a 2X and a 1.4X and both produce sharp results.

          The problem that you run into when you use a 2X is that on my 40D (along with the lower D models - except I am not sure about the 50D) you lose autofocus beyond f5.6. In other words, an f4 lens + a 2X converter makes the lens an effective f8. In that case, the autofocus is disabled.

          This image was taken with a 2X attached...



          That's pretty dang sharp...

          Comment


            #6
            Is that a swift fox, Russell?

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Shane View Post
              Is that a swift fox, Russell?
              It is...

              Do you remember the time I proclaimed us 1%ers?

              The time I shot this image it was a 1%er time..

              -RG

              Comment


                #8
                That's for sure. Rare little suckers. Where/when was that?

                The only place I've ever seen a swift was at several basketball tournaments. (Nazereth Swifts)

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Shane View Post
                  That's for sure. Rare little suckers. Where/when was that?

                  The only place I've ever seen a swift was at several basketball tournaments. (Nazereth Swifts)
                  I took these in July of 2007 near Dalhart. For a species that was though extinct in Texas until 1998, I saw seven in this one day.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Thanks Russell, that is something to think about. That is a sharp image.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      my 2X has served me well



                      made my 200 a 400 for this shot

                      Comment


                        #12
                        I was debating the 1.4x or the 2.0x but I bought the F/2.8 so it brings in alot of light so I am 400mm at F/5.6... with my 2.0x.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X