Reply
Go Back   TexasBowhunter.com Community Discussion Forums > Topics > Around the Campfire
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2018, 10:48 AM   #1
Sleepy
Pope & Young
 
Sleepy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Tyler, TX
Hunt In: Camp County, Rusk County, Smith County, Kansas
Default Eco Boost or 5.0?

About to hop into another truck and wanted everybodyís opinion on the two. Heard great things about both.
Sleepy is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 10:52 AM   #2
150class
Pope & Young
 
150class's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston
Hunt In: Uvalde, Boerne
Default

When I did all my research before grabbing mine it was pretty even at 50/50 on opinions for going eco or 5.0.

I ended up going 5.0 and have been plenty satisifed. Imagine if I went eco I wouldn’t be feeling much different either.

Good luck on the new truck
150class is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 10:53 AM   #3
Flex
Ten Point
 
Flex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Centex
Hunt In: The Bushes
Default

Man, this should be a good thread!

Ecoboost- more fun to drive, possible better fuel economy if you can keep your foot out of it. Driving experience can take some time to get used too. Also more potential for problems.

5.0 - Rock solid, reliable, slightly less fuel economy, V8 rumble, less performance if you want to drive a truck like a hot rod.

My dad has had both in 4 door lariat. Prefers the EcoBoost because of better fuel economy and said it was more fun to drive.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using Tapatalk
Flex is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 10:53 AM   #4
jdn79
Six Point
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newark
Default

I have the 5.0 in a 2017 crew cab. No complaints yet at 20k miles. Avg 18.5 mpg
jdn79 is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 10:54 AM   #5
ballgame
Ten Point
 
ballgame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Houston
Hunt In: Hill Country
Default

Cant go wrong with either.

I have a 2012 3.5L Eco that I bought new in June 2012

135,000 miles and no issues so far
ballgame is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 10:55 AM   #6
tx_basser
Four Point
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Sachse, TX
Hunt In: Any place Public
Default

I bought a 2015 with 2.7 Eco back in March and I have to say.. it has been wonderful. It tows the bassboat like it was not there, towed my jeep wrangler on a trailer with ease, great mpg, etc. I don't think you will go wrong with either one.
tx_basser is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 10:57 AM   #7
LlanoHunter10
Four Point
 
LlanoHunter10's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: League City
Hunt In: Llano
Default

I love my 3.5 ecoboost. 365 horses AND 420 torque! No problem pulling a decent trailer and gets up to speed quickly on the entrance ramps. I average 18 mpg with 33 inch all terrains. I was getting 20 with stock tires.

Last edited by LlanoHunter10; 07-06-2018 at 11:30 AM.
LlanoHunter10 is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 10:57 AM   #8
hogman$
Six Point
 
hogman$'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Seminole
Hunt In: West texas
Default

i have a 5.0 and like it just under 100,000 miles not a single problem and it dont sound like a rice burner
hogman$ is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 10:58 AM   #9
30-30
Pope & Young
 
30-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tomball
Hunt In: Hopkins County
Default

Happy eco boost owner here. Mpgs could be better but that may be a result of how fun the truck is to drive. I get 15-17 mixed city and highway at 75+.

My only complaint is a little shake/vibration at idle that multiple shops have told me is normal.
30-30 is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 11:00 AM   #10
MagicBlade
Eight Point
 
MagicBlade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Keller, Texas
Hunt In: Archer County Texas
Default

I have a 2011 F150 4x4 with the EcoBoost 3.5L V6 with 136,520 miles and average 18 - 19 mpg.
Love it, pulls my camper and trailer with ease.
MagicBlade is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 11:08 AM   #11
44mAG
Ten Point
 
44mAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Buda, TX
Default

I have a 2013 Eco boost with around 55K miles on it with no issues. Not impressed with the mpg but that's not why I bought it. Average around 14.5 mpg. I do have a 6.5' bed, 4x4 with the max gears and max tow package though. Also have leveling springs on the front, brush guard, plus bigger than stock tires. Love the truck.

Last edited by 44mAG; 07-06-2018 at 11:25 AM.
44mAG is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 11:11 AM   #12
tmurray
Ten Point
 
tmurray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Cypress, TX
Hunt In: Victoria
Default

I saw the same mileage as 44mAG, about 14.5 mpg in my 2014 EcoBoost. Was a fun truck to drive though, it was fast. I hear the new ones are way better on fuel economy.
tmurray is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 11:12 AM   #13
Ryanm
Four Point
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Houston
Hunt In: Nacogdoches, Michigan
Default

I just bought a 2018 3.5 and it has been great. 21mpg on the highway and tons of power.

My only suggestion would be to stay away from the older EB models that didn't have the new dual fuel injection setup. When I was researching, there were many reports of issues with carbon building up on the valves causing issues. That being said, it's not guaranteed to be a problem.
Ryanm is online now   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 11:19 AM   #14
BuckSmasher
Ten Point
 
BuckSmasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tyler, TX
Hunt In: All Over
Default

I vote Eco, especially if you tow a lot.
BuckSmasher is online now   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 11:22 AM   #15
SeaSpray
Four Point
 
SeaSpray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Hunt In: South Texas
Default

5.0 all the way. I have a 2013 with 165,000 with only a few minor issues that have been addressed on the newer models. 5.0 is solid with 15-18 mpg with a leveling kit, extra leave springs on the back, 285 tires and replacement bumpers on front and back. My opinion is the eco boost has too many bells and whistles and not designed for any modifications
SeaSpray is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 11:26 AM   #16
Pineywoods
Ten Point
 
Pineywoods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Polk County
Hunt In: Elkhart, Splendora, Laneville & Throckmorton
Default

Both great engines... I have always been a V8 guy but I've had my ecoboost for over a year and love it.
Pineywoods is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 11:31 AM   #17
skinsfan
Four Point
 
skinsfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Corpus Christi
Hunt In: Goliad/Medina County
Default

I have a 2018 5.0 with 8000 miles and am not too impressed so far. MPG are 15-16 90% highway and it lacks much get up and go. The transmission is rough to say the least and hard shifts on a regular basis but it may be a lemon.
skinsfan is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 11:35 AM   #18
Pineywoods
Ten Point
 
Pineywoods's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Polk County
Hunt In: Elkhart, Splendora, Laneville & Throckmorton
Default

The ecoboost engines create a good amount of power. Even the little 4 cylinder 2.3l ecoboost in the base Mustang's produce 310hp and torque is 350@ 3000rpm.
Pineywoods is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 11:36 AM   #19
aggie182
Six Point
 
aggie182's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Missouri City, TX
Default

I have a 2016 2.7L Eco. It's a 4 door, 4wd, XL. It's a commuter 90% of the time. I've taken through some super sold sand on the beach and offroaded to several kayak fishing launches. It's been fine in the limited mud it's seen. No complaints so far. I haven't reset one of my trip meters and it's at 21.2 mpg over 38k miles. The other trip meter is at 21.5 over the last several thousand miles. I don't tow, I don't do anything too wild in it. It's pretty much a dad-mobile to get the family to the beach and where ever else we want to go whether on or off the pavement.
aggie182 is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 11:41 AM   #20
mzurovec
Ten Point
 
mzurovec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Liberty Hill
Hunt In: Blanco, Burnet
Default

I'd go with Eco. Lots of get up compared to the 5.0 I have now.
mzurovec is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 11:43 AM   #21
mzurovec
Ten Point
 
mzurovec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Liberty Hill
Hunt In: Blanco, Burnet
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan View Post
I have a 2018 5.0 with 8000 miles and am not too impressed so far. MPG are 15-16 90% highway and it lacks much get up and go. The transmission is rough to say the least and hard shifts on a regular basis but it may be a lemon.
I've had a very similar experience. Mine only has 3200 miles, but I'm averaging 15.5. I liked the Eco I had before much better.
mzurovec is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 12:03 PM   #22
samson33
Four Point
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeaSpray View Post
5.0 all the way. I have a 2013 with 165,000 with only a few minor issues that have been addressed on the newer models. 5.0 is solid with 15-18 mpg with a leveling kit, extra leave springs on the back, 285 tires and replacement bumpers on front and back. My opinion is the eco boost has too many bells and whistles and not designed for any modifications
The eco has tons of mods available.
samson33 is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 12:08 PM   #23
BowSlayer
Pope & Young
 
BowSlayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Troup
Hunt In: Smith and Sutton County
Default

Good thread. I was going to post the same question and found this one. I'm going back to a F150 when I sell my Cummins.
BowSlayer is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 12:09 PM   #24
ckamp52
Ten Point
 
ckamp52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Burleson, TX
Hunt In: looking for a drama free lease...if it exists anymore
Default

I had a 3.5 eco and loved it. pulled trailers very well. Probably would still have it if my needs hadn't changed. We have a few at work and for the most part they have been reliable. I keep my trucks a long time and honestly got a little worried if I towed as often as I was with decent load for a half ton it would not hold up. It may have lasted couple hundred thousand miles for all I know but repairs can get expensive in a hurry when its not a naturally aspirated engine. Same reason I went with the 6.2 in my F250 vs the diesel. Miss the power sometimes but it does what I need it to do and hopefully wont have the repair bills that come with those new diesels once they are out of warranty. just using the fuel system on the 6.7 as an example is over 10k. My dad has had several ecos and went back to a 5.0 this time and says he likes it and gets decent mileage but liked the eco better when towing or loaded down with anything
ckamp52 is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 12:09 PM   #25
Reelthreat
Six Point
 
Reelthreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Cestohowa
Default

I had a 2015 work truck with the 5.0 and my personal is a 2015 Eco. I prefer the Eco by far... not even a comparison. Nothing wrong with the 5.0 but the Eco is fun to drive.
Reelthreat is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 12:16 PM   #26
Gary Roberson
Eight Point
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Default

The Robersons have three different 3.5 Ecoboost engines in three FX4 models. No problems in any of them and mileage is around 18 on the average if I don't drive 75-80 mph. I pull an enclosed trailer that weighs 5,000 lbs. empty with no problems. I also put mine in more rugged country than any of you will ever see unless you hunt lions in the Navajo Nation.
Adios,
Gary
Gary Roberson is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 12:17 PM   #27
Drycreek3189
Pope & Young
 
Drycreek3189's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Default

The 2012 5.0 I had got 16.5 mpg and I sold it at 180k with very few issues. Biggest thing was O2 sensors and that was after 160k.

The 2018 gets 19.5 to 20 mpg. I should clarify that on the road with no idling it gets 21/22 mpg. It pulls my Ranger on a heavy 12' trailer plus 1,000 lb. of corn with no problems. It gets around 14mpg doing that.

No experience with the Eco-boost other than when I bought the 2012 my dealer advised against it.

Last edited by Drycreek3189; 07-06-2018 at 12:21 PM.
Drycreek3189 is online now   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 12:24 PM   #28
Rcm
Spike
 
Rcm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: loving tx
Hunt In: young county
Default

have worked for ford for 9 years as a tech, eco boost will get good mileage if you stay out of it you drive it hard the mileage goes way down, dove a 18 5.0 4x4 to ford training in Lewisville got over 20 mpg the week I drove it, eco boost come in a lot with misses do lots of tune ups.

hope this helps good luck on your choice.
Rcm is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 12:25 PM   #29
txpitdog
Pope & Young
 
txpitdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kingwood
Hunt In: Polk Co., TX & La Flore Co., OK
Default

2015 3.5EB with 78k. So far so good. Not so much as a hiccup, and the low rpm power band is great for fun and towing.
txpitdog is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 12:25 PM   #30
quackadikt
Eight Point
 
quackadikt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Hunt In: Wherever I can
Default

What kind of towing capacity do the ecos have?
quackadikt is online now   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 12:45 PM   #31
gmac
Ten Point
 
gmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hunt County
Hunt In: Hunt County
Default

I had a 2013 5.0, sold it and got a 2013 eco boost. Both were/are 4x4 crew cabs. I got better fuel mileage in the 5.0 by a little better than 2 mpg. Personally I enjoyed the V8 more just sounded like I was driving a truck. No real complaints about the eco boost, just isn’t for me and I don’t really see the advantage to it.
gmac is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 12:52 PM   #32
oldtestamentman
Six Point
 
oldtestamentman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Texas
Hunt In: South
Default

I've got a 2013 eco boost. A little shaky idle when I start up in the mornings.
MPG is excellent 19-21 if you can stay at 70 mph at 1,900 rpm
MPG drops allot once you go over 75, and 2,000 rpm to 14-16.
Lots of passing power when you need it.
Since I learned to stay under 70 mph, I've been getting over 450 miles per tank.
oldtestamentman is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 12:57 PM   #33
Rcm
Spike
 
Rcm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: loving tx
Hunt In: young county
Default

Eco has more towing capacity than the 5.0
Rcm is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 01:02 PM   #34
SaltwaterSlick
Pope & Young
 
SaltwaterSlick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Default

I had a '13 Platinum Super crew with the 3.5 ecoboost... It was an OK truck but I never could get used to the "hesitation" in that EB engine... When you roll out to go around someone, you got to plan ahead because there's a hesitation/time between when you mash the pedal and the computer tells the turbos to wind up and the injectors send the fuel to the engine... I put 156K miles on it, orderd a '18 King Ranch initially with another EB engine, then switched at the last minute to the 5.0 V8. Got it last October and have 32K miles on it so far... For me personally, it is a MUCH better drive train. You mash that naturally asperated V8, and that sucker goes... no hesitation, and I'm getting better gas mileage with the 5.0 than I did with the EB. I am VERY glad I got the V8. I pull a trailer with a Honda Pioneer on it and gear. I also have a 10 foot dump bed 6 yard trailer that I haul dirt, rocks, sand, mulch and such. Have a 20 foot lowboy that I haul my 57 HP John Deere tractor w/loader and various implements on the back. Have an Alumacraft 18-60 rigged for bowfishing on a trailer. This truck does a very good job with all of that. If I ordered another one today, It would be the 5.0 and NOT the EcoBoost.

Edit to add: I espeically like the 10 speed tranny that this '18 has. The '13 EB had a 6 speed and when running with cruise, it was constantly downshifting whenever there was an incline... annoying to the point I didn't use cruise when pulling any kind of trailer... The 5.0 with the 10 speed tranny is nice.

Last edited by SaltwaterSlick; 07-06-2018 at 01:05 PM.
SaltwaterSlick is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 01:03 PM   #35
Mudslinger
Pope & Young
 
Mudslinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lubbock, TX
Hunt In: Kent Co., Stonewall Co., CO, Limpopo RSA
Default

2014 5.0 4x4 Super Crew that will flat haul butt when needed and it ain't no slow poke anywhere on the road or in town. I do not know about mileage as mine goes from over to 17 to under 11 depending on how I am driving or what I am loaded with or towing. Never bought a vehicle for mileage so I really do not care what mileage I get as long as it gets me there and back.

When I bought this truck in 2014, the Eco Boost had been out for 3 years as had the 6.0 diesel I bought in 2006. Spent $12,000 on the 6.0 so I was not about to do that again with the Eco Boost, never even drove one as I had my mind already made up when I started looking. Maybe a mistake, but I am very happy with my '14 5.0!
Mudslinger is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 01:20 PM   #36
jimmyneutrontx
Ten Point
 
jimmyneutrontx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Magnolia, Tx
Hunt In: Brady, Tx
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleepy View Post
About to hop into another truck and wanted everybodyís opinion on the two. Heard great things about both.
Xxvsdcsvxdqsexfvsqbaqscscassxn8jeSabqzssae32222332 e bps

Sent from my LG-M150 using Tapatalk
jimmyneutrontx is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 01:28 PM   #37
rferg84
Ten Point
 
rferg84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Sweetwater TX
Hunt In: Nolan and Fisher Counties
Default

I have the 3.5 Ecoboost in a 2018 Expedition, itís a stud.

Iíve had the 5.0 in an F-150, it sounds a lot better.

Both got the jobs done. I was against the EB for a long time but itís pretty nice.
rferg84 is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 03:03 PM   #38
30-30
Pope & Young
 
30-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tomball
Hunt In: Hopkins County
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyneutrontx View Post
Xxvsdcsvxdqsexfvsqbaqscscassxn8jeSabqzssae32222332 e bps

Sent from my LG-M150 using Tapatalk
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LqVNGSh-8Wo
30-30 is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 03:15 PM   #39
BETTERLUCKYTHANGOOD
Ten Point
 
BETTERLUCKYTHANGOOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Liberty hill
Hunt In: Have bow will travel
Default

My GF owns a 3.5 EB, it isn't a bad truck, just a lot of moving parts (twin turbos and all). I tried to talk her into the 5.0....simpler power train. That is the way I look at things being a mechanic. Both will tow, both will get about the same mileage, 5.0 sounds like a real truck.
Now if you go with the 3.5 EB the first thing you want to do is install a vapor separator in the PCV system. This will keep the back of the valves cleaner, it's an issue that the 3.5 has, ford knows it, they get big$$$$ to do the repair. I did it on my GFs truck at about 9000 miles.
BETTERLUCKYTHANGOOD is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 06:32 PM   #40
James
Ten Point
 
James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: San Antonio, TX
Hunt In: Kinney County, SE Kansas and Out West
Default

My 5.0 gets better mileage then my buddies eco with same size tires, mine has 150k miles no major problems. J-Bone on here just hit 250k miles on his 2013 5.0 with no major problems. The 5.0 has been best truck I've ever owned
James is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 06:58 PM   #41
Sleepy
Pope & Young
 
Sleepy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Tyler, TX
Hunt In: Camp County, Rusk County, Smith County, Kansas
Default

Thanks fellas. Sounds like the simpler motor that will do anything and everything I need to do with a 1/2 ton will be the 5.0.

Appreciate all the opinions!
Sleepy is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 07:27 PM   #42
kumathebear
Pope & Young
 
kumathebear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: DFW area
Hunt In: Anywhere and when I can!
Default

I may have had a Lemon, but not my problem anymore. Some may recall the various threads I put on asking for advice so here's the basics:

2013 Ford King Ranch with the Eco engine. LOVED the truck and look but right around 70K miles, here we go...sudden loss of power, engine light on, scared the hell out of me since I'm retired now.

Had it repaired, repaired again...drove great for a day or two and here we go again. Finally had 2 Ford mechanics, one on TBH, tell me they had seen a LOT of problems with this year model and also seen engine replacements less than 150K miles? They BOTH told me, in all fairness, that models after 2013 were much better but did not help me.

Got rid of it and happy with my Tundra now. I know, we all can have great rides, but there is always one and with me it was the Eco in this year model. NOT bashing, just my experience. Oh....this particular ECO engine had lot's of power until I had to tow my 16' Tandum with a Crew UTV...still had response but averaged less than 10MPG...but again...not just the Eco. Tundra MPG sucks but it has all the power I need in the 5.7.
kumathebear is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 07:28 PM   #43
Cantcatch5
Ten Point
 
Cantcatch5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Tyler, TX
Default

I couldn’t decide when I went to buy mine in 2015. The dealership had two identical trucks, other than the engine, that I was interested in. I test drove both and the 5.0 sounded much better but the EB was noticeably quicker and more fun to drive in the “seat of the pants” test. I ended up buying the Ecoboost because eventhough it had the higher sticker price they would sell it to me for less.

I have 32,000 miles on it and have had no problems with it at all. It is fun to drive and tows like a beast!
Cantcatch5 is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 07:44 PM   #44
hopedale
Ten Point
 
hopedale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Williamson county
Hunt In: WMAs
Default

I got the ecoboost in my 2017 Expedition. Really impressed with the gas millage in town and on the road.

Now, when I trailer my boat it does take a bit of a dive, but still happy with the engine.
hopedale is online now   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 07:50 PM   #45
futureagg
Six Point
 
futureagg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Tomball
Hunt In: Deep East Tx
Default

I just bought a 2018 5.0v8.
My thoughts so far:
V8 has plenty of power
Put bigger tires on it with 3.31 gearing and I am still getting 18mpg in Houston.
The auto start/stop technology in all of the new F150s is a real pain in the ***

I liked the V8 more when I drove them back to back comparing the 3.5 eco and the v8.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
futureagg is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 08:46 PM   #46
Mike D
Pope & Young
 
Mike D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: North Texas
Hunt In: Haskell County, TX
Default

Either one of them are well up to the task that most folks would do. MPG wonít be different enough between the 2 to even discuss.

As to power, the ecoboost has noticeably more pull in the lower RPM range and the 5.0 loves to rev.

Both of them have between 370-395HP. Anyone that says either one is slow is just silly.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Mike D is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 08:51 PM   #47
Artos
Pope & Young
 
Artos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Deep South TX
Hunt In: Deep South TX
Default

I'm digging the new company 5.0...the A10 is really nice & getting upwards of 600 miles out of the 36gal tank which is nice. Only had it since late March but already have 22k miles.

Coming from the 6.0 2500, it is VERY nice to have a truck than can pass without needing a landing strip.
Artos is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 09:25 PM   #48
BMAC_GTX
Six Point
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Georgetown,Tx.
Hunt In: Milam Co. and Foard Co.
Default

I had a 5.0 and traded it for a 3.5 EB. Both had leveling kits and 34" tires with custom tuning. I liked the 5.0 until it came to towing anything. It makes all it torque much higher in the RPM band and was always downshifting, even hills without towing. The EB on the other hand never downshifts and tows much better. The 5.0 had 3.55 gears and the EB has 3.73. The turbos are fun!
BMAC_GTX is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 09:29 PM   #49
LetsGetBloody
Spike
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Default

I really like my 5.0 I like KIS and figured since I drive one to around 300k I’d have less things to go wrong. Sounds good when you crank her up and hear that soft rumble!
LetsGetBloody is offline   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Old 07-06-2018, 09:36 PM   #50
bps3040
Pope & Young
 
bps3040's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Spring,Texas
Hunt In: West Texas, Dryden area, Forestville, Canada
Default

I have both. No problem with either. 190,000 on 5.0 and 90,000 on Eco boost


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
bps3040 is online now   Reply With Quote Back To The Top
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1999-2012, TexasBowhunter.com