The guns, high capacity clips, full auto mods, etc. enabled him. All bought legally.
Tell me why anyone needs stuff like that. Because it's fun? Cool?
Bridges allow people to jump off of them as well. Who needs that?
Listen, people will, and always have done evil things. It's not the guns, it's the people. The man owned two airplanes. He could have just as easily......or easier, flown one into the same crowd. ITS NOT THE GUNS!!! Now, quit being emotional and start being logical. It's not that hard........for most.
Right. Guns don't kill people. People kill people. Heard it a million times, and it's true. But he would have killed a whole lot less with a bolt action .270
The shooter was smart, and somewhat innovative in his attack. He also had a pilots license and lots of money and time. I think he could have used black guns and over the counter modification for a reason.
He shot and killed a bunch of rednecks.
Then got the government to take the rednecks black guns.
Right. Guns don't kill people. People kill people. Heard it a million times, and it's true. But he would have killed a whole lot less with a bolt action .270
He could have killed a whole lot more by filling one of his airplanes with gasoline and crashing into the crowd. What now? Ban airplanes. Remember 911?
Right. Guns don't kill people. People kill people. Heard it a million times, and it's true. But he would have killed a whole lot less with a bolt action .270
I beg to differ. With some 22,000 targets so close together, in the 9-10 minutes of shooting, I don't think 59 would be that unreasonable with an accurate rifle. Hell, how many did Oswald get off in just a few seconds?
He could have killed a whole lot more by filling one of his airplanes with gasoline and crashing into the crowd. What now? Ban airplanes. Remember 911?
But he didn't. And post 9-11, they took drastic new security measures to prevent that. What new measures do you approve here?
Ps. Nice to have a civilized debate. Nothing personal.
Comment