Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Boom

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Boom

    From the Chairman of the committee, Trump was right about surveilance.


    House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes set off a stunning new political controversy Wednesday by revealing that communications of President Donald Trump and associates may have been picked up after the election by intelligence agencies conducting surveillance of foreign targets.
    Last edited by Ætheling; 03-22-2017, 12:08 PM.

    #2
    Boom Boom!

    Comment


      #3
      Rachel Madcow just had a reverse orgasm!

      Comment


        #4
        Lot of this being eaten for dinner this evening.
        Attached Files

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by J Sweet View Post
          Lot of this being eaten for dinner this evening.
          lol
          no, they will make excuse after excuse as to how this is something completely different

          Comment


            #6
            "Oooooops. We incidentally collected personal communications on one of the most notorious billionaires in the world who also happens to be running for the Presidency of the United States." Give me a break. If there was such a thing as justice in our justice system, there'd be countless BHO operatives spending their remaining years on earth in an 8x8 cell trading cigarettes with a former 2 term president.

            Comment


              #7
              "This is a normal, incidental collection, based on what I could collect," Nunes said. "This appears to be all legally collected foreign intelligence under" the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

              i guess im missing the big "gotcha"



              Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by texasnavy05 View Post
                "This is a normal, incidental collection, based on what I could collect," Nunes said. "This appears to be all legally collected foreign intelligence under" the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

                i guess im missing the big "gotcha"



                Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

                It doesn't matter if its normal, un normal, quasi normal, legal, illegal, sort of legal. Surveillance was done under Obamas admin in the Trump transition team as early as Nov. which confirms what Trump said.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Nunes to give briefing on the matter from the White House shortly.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Done under FISA.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Additional names besides Flynn were unmasked. US Citizens.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Surveillance was "inappropriate" "Disturbing to me and should be disturbing to the President and his team".

                        Comment


                          #13
                          "Perhaps legal but not right" "I don't think the American public would approve"

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by J Sweet View Post
                            It doesn't matter if its normal, un normal, quasi normal, legal, illegal, sort of legal. Surveillance was done under Obamas admin in the Trump transition team as early as Nov. which confirms what Trump said.
                            i just don't understand why its a big deal if nothing illegal was done.

                            is this whole investigation just to prove trump right so republicans can say "i told you so!"?
                            or is there going to be a new subject for the "lock her up" chant lol


                            Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by texasnavy05 View Post
                              i just don't understand why its a big deal if nothing illegal was done.

                              is this whole investigation just to prove trump right so republicans can say "i told you so!"?
                              or is there going to be a new subject for the "lock her up" chant lol


                              Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
                              We should all be very concerned that our politicians can perform surveillance on US Citizens incidentally legal or otherwise for political purposes. Disgusting, a complete erosion of our 4th amendment rights. It has not been determined to have been legal yet or not.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X