Originally posted by JVasquez
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2018 College Football - Week 12
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
2018 College Football - Week 12
Originally posted by monsterspike View Postits too many teams. wayyyyyy too many. this scenario makes some of the conference title games useless, and a TON of the regular season games less meaningful.
my team is UF so ill pick on them specifically. they have THREE loses! they did not win the SEC east, and now they are in the title chase!??
4 teams is enough. imo.
I hear ya, although. The chance of a Cinderella NC are still slim.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk ProLast edited by Chad C; 11-16-2018, 07:38 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Burntorange Bowhunter View PostStart at the second round. 8 teams.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Agreed....4 teams sucks...8 teams give everybody sniffing around the henhouse a chance. 5 Power 5 conference champions and 3 at large. Teams win championships all the time with multiple losses. This long time "who was the best all year beauty contest team" having area or conference biased AP writers/media and coaches who don't have enough time to see their kids, let alone keep a finger on 40-50 top teams voting for who is ranked, is garbage and out of date. Let's not even talk about this committee with folks like Condoleezza Rice pulling names out of a hat. I think it would make the conference games more important....it would make the OOC games important for the at large bids too. And more importantly, it would make the post games for everybody who takes part in that playoff more important and exciting instead of a ****load of useless bowls. And for that very reason and that reason alone, 16 makes more sense than 4......but I still prefer 8.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JVasquez View PostEd Oliver has been a cancer for a while. Argues with the coaches, curses at the coaches, no efforts at practice and uncoachable.
I wouldn't have him on the sideline, if he wants to act like a *****, he can do it by himself in the training room...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Smart View PostAgreed....4 teams sucks...8 teams give everybody sniffing around the henhouse a chance. 5 Power 5 conference champions and 3 at large. Teams win championships all the time with multiple losses. This long time "who was the best all year beauty contest team" having area or conference biased AP writers/media and coaches who don't have enough time to see their kids, let alone keep a finger on 40-50 top teams voting for who is ranked, is garbage and out of date. Let's not even talk about this committee with folks like Condoleezza Rice pulling names out of a hat. I think it would make the conference games more important....it would make the OOC games important for the at large bids too. And more importantly, it would make the post games for everybody who takes part in that playoff more important and exciting instead of a ****load of useless bowls. And for that very reason and that reason alone, 16 makes more sense than 4......but I still prefer 8.
Yep. That’s the way I see it too.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Originally posted by Burntorange Bowhunter View PostStart at the second round. 8 teams.
Sent from my SM-G950U using TapatalkOriginally posted by Smart View PostAgreed....4 teams sucks...8 teams give everybody sniffing around the henhouse a chance. 5 Power 5 conference champions and 3 at large. Teams win championships all the time with multiple losses. This long time "who was the best all year beauty contest team" having area or conference biased AP writers/media and coaches who don't have enough time to see their kids, let alone keep a finger on 40-50 top teams voting for who is ranked, is garbage and out of date. Let's not even talk about this committee with folks like Condoleezza Rice pulling names out of a hat. I think it would make the conference games more important....it would make the OOC games important for the at large bids too. And more importantly, it would make the post games for everybody who takes part in that playoff more important and exciting instead of a ****load of useless bowls. And for that very reason and that reason alone, 16 makes more sense than 4......but I still prefer 8.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dale Moser View PostI tend to agree with you boys, but how sweet would 13 knocking off 4 be? It something crazy would happen every year!
I'm in for 16 too...why not.. Any of those two is better than what we have..
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dale Moser View PostAnd they can't kick him off the team because he's "hurt"?
I wouldn't have him on the sideline, if he wants to act like a *****, he can do it by himself in the training room...
My thoughts as well, glad Major still has some sh** in his neck and confronted him, said he made plenty mistakes when he was young too
Comment
Comment