Originally posted by cosmiccowboy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
arrowhead value
Collapse
X
-
"Historically accurate" could mean many things
It could mean the correct stone, or technique, or material. If it meats all those then you can check for age.
There are many indications that something has been aged. You can use lights and magnification. You can look at wear patterns. Most of the real ones have been "resharpened" or when broken it would have been made into a different tool. They can look at residue of what was used to make it or also see scratch or knapping marks in the creation. There are a bunch mroe clues too.
Comment
-
There are experts out there that will evaluate your artifacts, and provide a certificate of authenticity if they decide they are genuine and not modern reproductions. Here's one -- http://www.artifactgrading.com/ Remember, GIYF or Google Is Your Friend.
Comment
-
I've been knapping for a couple of years and during my learning process I have looked at thousands of pictures and hundreds of the real thing.
My opinion is that these are authentic reproductions based on the type of rock and percussion flake patterns. Number 1 is they both appear to be made from Chert flint commonly found here in Texas. Number 2 is they are just too perfect as in sharp edges which means they were never used or if they are real were probably a burial item placed with the deceased.
Number 2 is I have never seen this sort of style except in reproductions.
But then I ain't no expert and I ain't seen everything yet. There are many people out there that are able to verify the archaic name for these style of blades and also verify if they are authentic. I think I would take them to A&M and get them to give an opinion. I believe there are some people down at A&M that do this sort of thing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by arrowdiger View Post
Comment
-
The artifact on the left is a Scottsbluff which dates back all the way back to paleo times. Here are 4 Scottsbluff types that were in my house when a authenticator came over to look at my collection. I asked him to bring a few points over to show the family and he brought these.
So yes, these are found in very good g-10 condition. I'm not the one to say if it is authentic or not just by looking at the picture but it does look authentic to me. If it is authentic, I would not have sold it for $2,500 either. It is worth way more than that. I'm not one to put a definite price on it but I would put it in the 8k to 15k range. Just my opinion.
The one on the right I don't know off the top of my head...would have to break out the book on that one. Heck of a artifact if that is real too!
Comment
Comment