Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NRA asks ATF to review bumpstocks

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by Chase This! View Post
    It wasn't too long ago we had a federal ban on assault rifles. Everyone's life was fine then, we knew no different. Why now is it such a big deal?
    You do realize when there was an assault weapons ban that the gun homicide rate was higher than it is now, right?

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Ironman View Post
      You do realize when there was an assault weapons ban that the gun homicide rate was higher than it is now, right?
      No sir. Please post up that link. I'll read up.

      But you failed to answer my question.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Chase This! View Post
        No sir. Please post up that link. I'll read up.

        But you failed to answer my question.
        Shall not be infringed.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Chase This! View Post
          It wasn't too long ago we had a federal ban on assault rifles. Everyone's life was fine then, we knew no different. Why now is it such a big deal?

          I know you won't respond but I'll have a go at your question anyway:

          It WAS a big deal. It wasn't the media's pet topic so, it wasn't covered. Secondly, I don't recall being given a choice. I'm still not clear why "...shall not be infringed." is such a hard concept to grasp.

          I'd like you now to answer my question:

          Which Right or portion thereof are you willing to part with?

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by Chase This! View Post
            No sir. Please post up that link. I'll read up.

            But you failed to answer my question.
            I'll ask again. Do you have a problem with people owning fully automatic weapons?

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by Livin'2hunt View Post
              I know you won't respond but I'll have a go at your question anyway:

              It WAS a big deal. It wasn't the media's pet topic so, it wasn't covered. Secondly, I don't recall being given a choice. I'm still not clear why "...shall not be infringed." is such a hard concept to grasp.

              I'd like you now to answer my question:

              Which Right or portion thereof are you willing to part with?
              It was a big deal? Why? You couldn't make a living? You couldn't protect your home? Other?

              I'm willing to give up a portion of my right to bear arms. No one is suggesting we turn in all our guns.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by M16 View Post
                I'll ask again. Do you have a problem with people owning fully automatic weapons?
                Yes. How is that not clear to you?

                Comment


                  #38
                  Here's a link.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    I also believe a lot has changed in 226 years.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by Ironman View Post
                      Thanks.

                      Comment


                        #41
                        Originally posted by Chase This! View Post
                        I also believe a lot has changed in 226 years.
                        Yes it has. Do you think your first amendment should be limited to quill pen and paper. Surely the forefathers didn't foresee computers. That argument doesn't hold water.

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Originally posted by Ironman View Post
                          Yes it has. Do you think your first amendment should be limited to quill pen and paper. Surely the forefathers didn't foresee computers. That argument doesn't hold water.
                          Holler at me when an email kills 58 people. Exaggerating of course.

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Originally posted by Chase This! View Post
                            Because I think they can too easily be used to harm people and I don't see any benefit to society by allowing them. Sure, as the poster above me said "cool toy". I'm OK without the cool toys if it adds any safety to innocent people. I bet the victims don't much care about the cool toy.


                            They’ve been around for years with no incidents. Pure knee jerk reaction in the name of ding something.

                            As to “benefit to society” that’s true liberalism 101. Just ask Hillary. Paraphrasing here but as she has stated “it should
                            be less about the individual and more about the collective society”.

                            Bull crap. America is all about individualism and individual liberty.


                            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

                            Comment


                              #44
                              Originally posted by Chase This! View Post
                              Yes. How is that not clear to you?
                              Here's something you need to read.


                              Comment


                                #45
                                Originally posted by M16 View Post
                                Won't open. Never heard of The Jack News.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X