NRA asks ATF to review bumpstocks

[Chase This!]

Here's something you need to read.


https://thejacknews.com/law/gun-righ...es-since-1934/

Nice deer, though. Machine Gun kill?

[M16]

Nice deer, though. Machine Gun kill?

Thanks. Handgun. Machineguns are not legal for deer. But I do love to use them on hogs.

[BrandonA]

Because I think they can too easily be used to harm people and I don't see any benefit to society by allowing them. Sure, as the poster above me said "cool toy". I'm OK without the cool toys if it adds any safety to innocent people. I bet the victims don't much care about the cool toy.

How is that boat you have "chase this" or the truck you have to pull it with not considered toys and objects to harm people. I promise and guarantee you sir a person could murder more with your two toys than a bump stock ever could

[Mike D]

NRA asks ATF to review bumpstocks

Yes it has. Do you think your first amendment should be limited to quill pen and paper. Surely the forefathers didn't foresee computers. That argument doesn't hold water.

Holler at me when an email kills 58 people. Exaggerating of course.

Nice straw man there. But I'll play your game.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/03/us/michelle-carter-texting-suicide-sentencing/index.html

No amendment is more important than the other. No gun of any type has ever killed anyone on its own. It's taken a lunatic every single time. Quit blaming the inanimate object and blame the lunatic that chose to use it for evil.



Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

[Ironman]

Holler at me when an email kills 58 people. Exaggerating of course.

Cyber bullying comes to mind.

[Playa]

Holler at me when an email kills 58 people. Exaggerating of course.

Alcohol kills far more than 58, vehicles and hammers too... shall we prohibit them?

And you totally missed or ignored the parallel between the email/1st Amend & modern firearms/2Amend

Given your expressed closed mindedness, I'm leaning towards you just ignored it

[35remington]

Is this just a small concession to quiet the masses?

Something something frog in boiling water.

[Playa]

For reference 241 Americans dies every day as a result of alcohol.

Maybe that should be the media headline everyday. Obesity is probably more than that.

[texansfan]

I also believe a lot has changed in 226 years.

LoL
Yeah black people are legally able to learn to read
And women can vote

Isn't that progress?

[JTeLarkin08]

I’m good with it. I mean the military even uses 3 round burst. Why? Because you can’t hit **** when you can’t aim. That’s all the bump stocks do. I see nothing lost by getting rid of them



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BolilloLoco]

I don't understand the NRA on this one. The bad guys will always find a way to accomplish their goal. The libs know this. Most of them don't care about the 58 victims in Vegas. They just see an opportunity to make progress towards their goal. NRA has to see this. Don't they?

[Mike D]

I’m good with it. I mean the military even uses 3 round burst. Why? Because you can’t hit **** when you can’t aim. That’s all the bump stocks do. I see nothing lost by getting rid of them



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Have you ever fired full auto or even a slide fire stock?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[flywise]

I don't understand the NRA on this one. The bad guys will always find a way to accomplish their goal. The libs know this. Most of them don't care about the 58 victims in Vegas. They just see an opportunity to make progress towards their goal. NRA has to see this. Don't they?

I think there may be two reasons they called on the ATF to review them.
1. They could be the Sacrificial lamb
2. It will highlight the fact that the obama admin was in office when they were approved
I don't believe the NRA is caving to pressure, i believe they have a strategy of some kind.
Also, bumpstocks are not a constitutionally protected product. Banning them would not an infringement to the second amendment.

[DJM]

You guys do know that you can "bump fire " an AR without adding a specialty stock....right?

DJ

[Livin'2hunt]

It was a big deal? Why? You couldn't make a living? You couldn't protect your home? Other?

I'm willing to give up a portion of my right to bear arms. No one is suggesting we turn in all our guns.

Since you're going to duck and dodge with semantics, perhaps I should have asked:

Other than the 2nd Amendment, which Rights are you willing to forego or a portion thereof?

It was a big deal because Rights were trampled and freedom was taken away. Not your brand of freedom but freedom nonetheless. Do you know what resulted from the UT Tower shooting? I do. The cops realized they didn't have the tools or tactics to knock off one crazy dude with a bolt action rifle. What did they do? SWAT is what they came up with and they had more and better weapons. Times changed. The police changed with them. Citizens have the Right to do the same. Again, ...shall not be infringed.

And, yes, lots and lots of people in power are trying to take away guns. I'll name two currently in positions of power: Barbara Boxer and Nacy Pelosi.


I'm waiting.