I agree that there are numerous wholesale changes in timelines regarding how the shooting occurred. What I don't quite grasp is whether some over-arching conspiracy is at work. In other words, does someone here have an idea WHY these inconsistencies have occurred beyond confusion and ordinary bungling that often happens when multiple agencies share control of information? I mean it's easy to say "conspiracy" when plain incompetence may be the fault; or, perhaps, there is some far-reaching legitimate investigation going on which would be compromised by premature release of information.
I'm not saying the latter is the case, just saying it's a possibility.
Furthermore, I'm interested to know what would be the PURPOSE behind some grand scheme of a multiple-shooter-complete-wipeout scenario? What would be gained and by whom?
I'm not saying the latter is the case, just saying it's a possibility.
Furthermore, I'm interested to know what would be the PURPOSE behind some grand scheme of a multiple-shooter-complete-wipeout scenario? What would be gained and by whom?
Comment