Originally posted by Landrover
View Post
Originally posted by boblee
View Post
I think the Hawaii judges ruling was weak claiming 1st amendment reasons. The 6 countries cited are the 6 most conflict countries in the world and produce the majority Middle East extremist, but only account for less than 10% of the world's Muslims. You know what that means? 91% of the worlds muslims are welcome and available for immigration status. How is that predjudice against a religion?
The Maryland judge may actually have a valid argument, but I'm not familiar with nor can I find a specific citing of the federal law already active that he says the EO violates.
C'mon bob lee you are more cerebral than "the judge ruled, so it must be alright."
Comment