Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

No CHL in Texas???

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #46
    Originally posted by meltingfeather View Post
    Yes you do... it just has to have a stock and a barrel longer than 16"


    Touche' sir.

    Comment


      #47
      Originally posted by texansfan View Post
      ^^^^^Ditto



      I also don't think a biz owner should have to do all that 30.06 and 30.07 mess.

      Just a simple NO GUNS ALLOWED sign should suffice

      Just like a simple NO SHIRT, NO SHOES, NO SERVICE sign suffices.

      I don't care if you carry, just don't do it in MY STORE



      If I had a dog and a business had a NO PETS/DOGS sign then I just wouldn't bring my dog there


      The signs were a way to allow both sides their rights. I don't have a problem with the signs. Just shows where I'm not welcome so I try not to go.

      Comment


        #48
        Originally posted by Mike D View Post
        The signs were a way to allow both sides their rights. I don't have a problem with the signs. Just shows where I'm not welcome so I try not to go.
        Ditto

        Comment


          #49
          Not much to learn in a CHL class

          Comment


            #50
            Originally posted by texansfan View Post
            ^^^^^Ditto

            I also don't think a biz owner should have to do all that 30.06 and 30.07 mess.
            Just a simple NO GUNS ALLOWED sign should suffice
            Just like a simple NO SHIRT, NO SHOES, NO SERVICE sign suffices.
            I don't care if you carry, just don't do it in MY STORE

            If I had a dog and a business had a NO PETS/DOGS sign then I just wouldn't bring my dog there
            Legis did the 30.06 and 30.07 to eliminate confusion and future problems with "I didnt see the sign", or "I thought it said no smoking", etc. Hard to say you missed a 30.06/07 sign.

            Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

            Comment


              #51
              many of the ones that shouldn't be carrying today are carrying today without a permit anyway

              Comment


                #52
                Felons have lost that constitutional right. If you're a law abiding non-felon then people should be able to protect themselves. Whatever that means. Especially these days with all the crazy crap going on in this country. Prime example just happened in Florida at that airport. The whacko was the only one with a gun. How many people died waiting on someone with a gun to stop a man with a gun. That's what the 2nd amendment is to me these days And any law restricting it should be viewed the same as any law restricting freedom of speech. Yet it is not! A CHL is only a way for the government to regulate or control your rights. You don't need a license to speak. You shouldn't need a license to carry.
                Last edited by Arrowslinger1; 01-10-2017, 09:11 PM.

                Comment


                  #53
                  Originally posted by Arrowslinger1 View Post
                  Felons have lost that constitutional right. If you're a law abiding non-felon then people should be able to protect themselves. Whatever that means. Especially these days with all the crazy crap going on in this country. Prime example just happened in Florida at that airport. The whacko was the only one with a gun. How many people died waiting on someone with a gun to stop a man with a gun. That's what the 2nd amendment is to me these days And any law restricting it should be viewed the same as any law restricting freedom of speech. Yet it is not! A CHL is only a way for the government to regulate or control your rights. You don't need a license to speak. You shouldn't need a license to carry.


                  I agree.

                  Comment


                    #54
                    I don't have a CHL license and never will. I do have the 2nd amendment.

                    Comment


                      #55
                      Originally posted by Arrowslinger1 View Post
                      Felons have lost that constitutional right. If you're a law abiding non-felon then people should be able to protect themselves. Whatever that means. Especially these days with all the crazy crap going on in this country. Prime example just happened in Florida at that airport. The whacko was the only one with a gun. How many people died waiting on someone with a gun to stop a man with a gun. That's what the 2nd amendment is to me these days And any law restricting it should be viewed the same as any law restricting freedom of speech. Yet it is not! A CHL is only a way for the government to regulate or control your rights. You don't need a license to speak. You shouldn't need a license to carry.
                      X2!

                      Comment


                        #56
                        Originally posted by Arrowslinger1 View Post
                        Felons have lost that constitutional right. If you're a law abiding non-felon then people should be able to protect themselves. Whatever that means. Especially these days with all the crazy crap going on in this country. Prime example just happened in Florida at that airport. The whacko was the only one with a gun. How many people died waiting on someone with a gun to stop a man with a gun. That's what the 2nd amendment is to me these days And any law restricting it should be viewed the same as any law restricting freedom of speech. Yet it is not! A CHL is only a way for the government to regulate or control your rights. You don't need a license to speak. You shouldn't need a license to carry.
                        I agree, but the 2nd amendment is so much more than just self defense even today.

                        Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G890A using Tapatalk

                        Comment


                          #57
                          Originally posted by AntlerCollector View Post
                          I don't have a CHL license and never will. I do have the 2nd amendment.


                          In theory I agree 100% with you.

                          In reality don't get caught carrying a handgun on your person without one.


                          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

                          Comment


                            #58
                            Originally posted by RMW View Post
                            Not much to learn in a CHL class


                            Wow. Didn't realize we had so many penal code experts on here.

                            Who knew?!


                            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

                            Comment


                              #59
                              A few of you have more faith in humanity than I do. There's a bunch of people in this world that just don't have a clue. A couple of the people in my 15 member class this last Sunday didn't pass the shooting portion for GOOD reason, they were just awful! No business with a firearm...

                              Comment


                                #60
                                Originally posted by jimmyjams4110 View Post
                                A few of you have more faith in humanity than I do. There's a bunch of people in this world that just don't have a clue. A couple of the people in my 15 member class this last Sunday didn't pass the shooting portion for GOOD reason, they were just awful! No business with a firearm...


                                So just because someone isn't a proficient shooter nullifies their constitutional right to own and carry a handgun?




                                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X