I don’t think that you can spend enough taxpayers’ money to “harden” the schools sufficiently.
If a shooter has as accomplice, it is almost impossible.
There some strategies that might lessen the murdere (8 dead instead of 20) but not a person that has time and planning on his side.
In fact you can completely lock a school down and not stop a person willing to do it.
The biggest chance to stop them is in the planning stage, not at the point of attack.
Taking tips and follow up more aggressively might help stop some incidents, if you get that tip which can be from a student, a healthcare professional, etc.
And then what about private schools that don’t have the funding by being able to take their way into action?
IMO
If a shooter has as accomplice, it is almost impossible.
There some strategies that might lessen the murdere (8 dead instead of 20) but not a person that has time and planning on his side.
In fact you can completely lock a school down and not stop a person willing to do it.
The biggest chance to stop them is in the planning stage, not at the point of attack.
Taking tips and follow up more aggressively might help stop some incidents, if you get that tip which can be from a student, a healthcare professional, etc.
And then what about private schools that don’t have the funding by being able to take their way into action?
IMO
Comment