Shouldn’t the play in games be for 16 seed spots, not 11 seed like the UCLA/St Bonaventure game?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NCAA tournament question
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by neskora View PostFor the team playing the play-in game - yes. But, for the team that earned that #1 seed, no. If you were Kansas, who would you rather play - Penn or UCLA/Syracuse? Having watched 0 games for any of those teams this year, I have no doubt that the correct answer is Penn.
Comment
-
NCAA tournament question
Originally posted by curtintex View PostI just think the whole play-in process is as stupid as hell. Have your 32 conference winners then pick the next 32 best teams in the country. You know, the way it was done for years?
I’m just not sure the NCAA could support itself without the revenue from those extra games......
At the end of the day it’s all about money. Common sense need not apply.
Edit: Which is to say, I agree with you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by neskora View PostI’m just not sure the NCAA could support itself without the revenue from those extra games......
At the end of the day it’s all about money. Common sense need not apply.
Edit: Which is to say, I agree with you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Playa View PostThe NCAA made 995 million dollars in 2016, I don’t think a significant % was from a handful of playoff games most don’t care to watch
What’s your opinion on their reasoning for doing it? I agree that those games aren’t significant, but I can’t see any other motivation than giving them an additional product to sell two nights earlier.
Comment
-
Originally posted by neskora View PostWhat’s your opinion on their reasoning for doing it? I agree that those games aren’t significant, but I can’t see any other motivation than giving them an additional product to sell two nights earlier.
Comment
Comment